Scan fast. Dive deeper.
Some scores may surprise you.

"Complete and balanced" means a food meets the legal minimum — not that it is optimally formulated. A food can carry that label while listing corn as its first ingredient, using synthetic preservatives flagged by the WHO, and coloring its kibble with dyes that dogs cannot even perceive.

"Premium." "Holistic." "Veterinarian recommended." None of these terms have legal definitions. Any manufacturer can use them regardless of what's inside the bag.

This score measures quality protein sources, carbohydrate load, and formula transparency — not regulatory compliance. Some well-known brands score lower than their reputation suggests. Some plant-based and lesser-known brands score considerably higher. The ingredients tell the truth regardless of the marketing budget behind them.

That's not a criticism of your choices — it's information you deserve to have.

Transparency disclosure

AisleIQ was developed by NOBL Foods. NOBL products are evaluated using the exact same criteria, weights, and scoring methodology as every other brand in this database — no exceptions. The composite score, digestibility proxy, and EAA/protein proxy apply identically to all products including our own. If you believe any score is inaccurate or inconsistent across brands, we want to know: customerservice@noblfoods.com. We built this tool because we believe every dog owner deserves to see past the marketing on every bag — including ours.

Scan fast. Dive deeper.
Pet food nutrition intelligence
Barcode / UPC
or search by name
NOBL Beef & Chicken NOBL Turkey & Duck NOBL Vegan Nulo FD Beef Primal Beef Open Farm Chicken Stella & Chewy's Beef Open Farm Grass Fed Beef Orijen FD Adult Answers Beef Raw SUNDAYS Beef ZiwiPeak Beef ZiwiPeak Air Dried Beef ZiwiPeak Steam Beef Pet Plate Beef JFFD Beef Vdog Gather by Petcurean Wild Earth Natural Balance Veg Purina HA Veg Acana Heritage Orijen Original Orijen Kibble Wellness Core Turkey Wellness Core Original Wellness Complete Chicken Taste Wild Pacific Taste Wild High Prairie Merrick GF Chicken Solid Gold Beef Nature's Logic Beef Natural Balance Fish Pedigree Adult Purina Pro Plan Blue Buffalo LPF Hill's Science Diet 7+ Pro Plan Sensitive Pro Plan Bright Minds Royal Canin GI Purina EN Diet Iams ProActive
About AisleIQ
Scan fast. Dive deeper.
Transparency disclosure

AisleIQ was developed by NOBL Foods. NOBL products are evaluated using the exact same criteria, weights, and scoring methodology as every other brand in this database — no exceptions.

The composite score, digestibility proxy, and EAA/protein proxy apply identically to all products including our own. We built this tool because we believe every dog owner deserves to see past the marketing on every bag — including ours.

If you believe any score is inaccurate or inconsistent across brands, we want to know: customerservice@noblfoods.com

How scoring works
Composite Score
The headline number. Weighted: Ingredient Quality (40%) + Digestibility (30%) + EAA/Protein Quality (30%). This is the number that reflects the full nutritional picture.
Ingredient Quality
Scores the actual quality of what's in the formula — and what isn't. Built from six sub-scores: protein foundation (whole meats, organ inclusion, protein density), natural sufficiency (whole-food nutrients replacing synthetics), carbohydrate quality, fat source quality, safety profile, and ingredient count. A formula earns its score from zero — every point is justified.
Digestibility Proxy
Estimates how well your dog can absorb the food. Based on processing format (freeze-dried and raw score above kibble), protein prominence, starch dilution, fiber burden, and mineral delivery form. Anchored to verified digestibility data when published by the manufacturer — NOBL's 91.6% measured protein digestibility is the freeze-dried tier calibration anchor.
EAA / Protein Quality
Estimates amino acid completeness. Uses actual EAA panel data when published by the manufacturer — currently 34 products in our database have verified data. Otherwise estimates from ingredients. Crude protein % on a label can be deeply misleading: plant protein isolates inflate the number while delivering fewer usable amino acids than named animal sources.
What the Ingredient Quality score actually measures

Most pet food rating tools start with a maximum score and subtract for problems. We built ours differently: every point is earned. A formula starts at zero and accumulates points across six sub-scores. The number you see represents what the formula actually delivers — not what it merely avoids.

The principle behind our scoring

A high-quality ingredient comes from nature. Quality is confirmed not just by what is present, but by what is absent — when whole-food sources adequately supply a nutrient, the corresponding synthetic form should not appear on the label.

Protein Foundation
up to 38 pts
The most heavily weighted sub-score. We evaluate the first ingredient, how many named animal proteins appear in the top three and top five, organ meat inclusion, and protein density on a dry matter basis. Named whole meats earn full credit. Organ meats — liver, kidney, heart, spleen, tripe — earn a separate bonus because they are categorically more nutrient-dense than muscle meat and represent whole-food complexity that synthetic supplements attempt to replicate. Generic ingredients and fractionated plant proteins that inflate label protein percentages are penalized.
Natural Sufficiency
up to 9 pts
The most distinctive part of our scoring. A bonus is awarded when a whole-food source of a specific nutrient is present and the corresponding synthetic form is absent. Red and organ meats supply zinc, iron, and copper abundantly — a formula with a strong organ base that also adds zinc proteinate and ferrous sulfate is telling you something: the base diet wasn't sufficient on its own. Liver supplies vitamins A, D, and B12 in their most bioavailable forms — adding synthetic versions on top is redundant. We reward formulas for the restraint of letting their ingredients do the job.
Carbohydrate Quality
up to 10 pts
Starts at the maximum and is reduced by carbohydrate load on a dry matter basis, refined starches in prominent positions, and added sugars. Whole fruits and vegetables restore up to 3 points. Dogs have no biological requirement for carbohydrates. Most commercial kibble contains 35–55% NFE (estimated carbs) on a dry matter basis — a number that never appears on any bag.
Fat Source Quality
up to 6 pts
Named animal fats and oils earn full credit. Whole meats prominent in the top five deliver fat within the natural food matrix — the highest quality fat delivery possible. Generic "animal fat" with no species specified and low-quality plant oils in prominent positions reduce the score.
Safety & Additives
+4 to −20 pts
A clean formula earns 4 points. Each concern reduces it: artificial colorants (dogs are dichromatic — Red 40, Blue 2, and Yellow 5 exist purely for human shelf appeal), synthetic preservatives (BHA and BHT carry WHO possible carcinogen classifications; ethoxyquin was developed as a rubber hardener), menadione (synthetic Vitamin K3, linked to liver toxicity at elevated doses), and ingredient splitting (the same ingredient listed multiple times under different names to obscure its true rank in the formula).
Ingredient Count
0 to −8 pts
Long ingredient lists are a signal. A formula with 40+ ingredients almost always has a weak whole-food base being patched by an extended synthetic tail. Formulas with 20 or fewer ingredients earn no penalty here — simplicity is a feature.
Score bands
85–100
Best
Named whole meats dominate. Organ meats present. Whole-food sources supply minerals and vitamins without synthetic reinforcement. Zero artificial additives. The formula trusts its ingredients to do the work.
70–84
Better
Strong animal protein sourcing. Clean preservation. Some synthetic mineral or vitamin supplementation, or moderate carbohydrate load. No artificial colors or preservatives. A well-formulated food with minor compromises.
50–69
Good
Acceptable for everyday feeding. Named protein sources present but may be accompanied by fractionated plant proteins, moderate starch load, or a standard synthetic vitamin and mineral stack. No major red flags.
30–49
When Necessary
Multiple formulation concerns across several sub-scores. Budget reality or therapeutic necessity may make this the right choice — but understand the trade-offs before feeding long-term.
15–29
Reconsider
Significant quality concerns: generic protein sources, high carbohydrate load, synthetic preservatives, or artificial colors. Consider alternatives when possible.
0–14
Avoid
Major concerns across multiple criteria. Meets regulatory minimums only. The marketing budget substantially exceeds the formulation budget.
AisleIQ · developed by NOBL Foods · customerservice@noblfoods.com
Side-by-side · Dive deeper
Scan two products to compare what actually matters
Scan first product
Scan second product
Your dog's profile
Set once — applied to every scan automatically
✓ Saved — applied to all future scans